John Pavlovitz has just written an excellent post on a Conservative Christian effort to boycott Disney for introducing a gay character to its classic Beauty and the Beast. His writing feels a little like a rant, because it is, and a justified one. I feel his frustration with people who claim to follow Jesus Christ but in reality stand against everything he stood for.
I would like to believe we’re coming to an inflection point where all but the most hard core supporters of Conservative Christianity turn away as they realize it’s all been an exercise in hatred and manipulation. Unfortunately, I don’t see that happening in the United States anytime soon. Here, Christianity is a cloak that the majority wear as a social identity, not a moral one, and they wear it in order to live their lives as they wish, without having to grow as human beings or care for anyone outside their tribe.
It’s very unfortunate that so many people use the life of a man who tried to bring us peace and joy to cover their addiction to fear and hatred.
A friend on G+ pointed out that this is a prime example of the right’s common tactic of taking any complaint the other side has about them, making the exact same complaint about the other side, and then repeating it until it sticks. I’m glad others see this tactic. It’s basic propaganda and we need to call it out wherever we see it.
The left needs to be on the attack as well as defense, all the time. The enemy of progress is relentless and we need to be too. As soon as the right starts some BS propaganda like this, the left needs to come out in force and ridicule the right while also explaining why it’s BS. We can’t reach everyone, but we need to make our voices as loud and far reaching as possible.
My biggest complaint about the left is that they usually refuse to play hardball and tell it like is. Sanders is a great exception and I think Warren is too. I’m a pretty intense person and I started adulthood in the Army infantry and then served as a deputy sheriff. I have a hard time with the left being meek and gentle when aggression is called for. We can be both kind and fierce, and we need to be both.
One major paper, one group of journalists, stood up to Hitler and the Nazis, refusing to normalize them, a crucial lesson for our times.
The Munich Post saw Hitler and the Nazis as they were. Rather than take the path of normalization and appeasement as the Weimar government and the world did, the Post journalists decided to fight, publicizing the truth behind the lies until they were closed down by the Nazis. At least some of them disappeared or ended up in Dachau, paying the ultimate price for their devotion to journalism.
I don’t usually become an official member of activist groups, even the ones I frequently donate to, but I’ve decided to make an exception for the ACLU. Below is what I gave the ACLU as my optional statement on why I joined.
“I’ve donated to the ACLU foundation before, including recently, but I’ve decided to formally join the ACLU because you’re the organization that best represents my values and you do the incredibly hard work to defend and advance civil rights in the United States.
I don’t agree with everything you do, but I admire your commitment to defend the civil rights of everyone, no matter their political stance or the (occasionally offensive to me) nature of their activities. Your work makes the United States a better nation.”
If someone you know considers Breitbart a news source, it’s best to avoid them if possible and minimize contact with them if not. Many people are capable of good faith discussion on serious issues. Many are not. Try not to waste your time on the latter.
Being able to talk to people you don’t know well is a vital work skill. If you can start a conversation with strangers, you’ll be rewarded with:
1. People opening up to you, helping you feel closer to them and them closer to you
2. A decreased level of stress and awkwardness (compared to silence)
3. Potential business or social opportunities for you or the person you’re talking with
The tips here are all excellent. I’m not good at small talk and I don’t enjoy it, but I make myself engage in it at work because it often leads to real, substantial communication which can benefit everyone. One of the tips, “Give them your full attention”, is an obvious one, but many of us have a hard time doing that. If you can really be present with someone, listening to them and paying attention to their tone, watching their body language, and thinking what they might be trying to communicate with their words (consciously or subconsciously), you’ll find that such presence is both its own reward and will give others the desire and confidence to open up to you. Give it a try. Focus completely on another person while they’re talking with you. Your relationship with them will likely grow in a positive way.
This is an excellent read and a very useful response to people who voted for Trump but want to claim they’re not hateful people. Scalzi’s post highlights the contradiction between supporting a racist, misogynist, fascist man and claiming to be none of those things.
This short piece in the MIT Technology Review is a very good read, worthwhile for anyone wondering how we’re going to solve our most pressing social and environmental issues.
I support strong government involvement (via targeted funding) in directing the economy towards solving our most serious problems, including climate change, the broader problem of transitioning to cleaner energy, improving our education system, reducing wealth inequality, and reducing violence. This article covers this topic, its potential and its historical pitfalls, well.
Professor Alan Lipman writes in CNN about Trump’s severe narcissism and the danger it poses to our nation. I’ve been using the term narcissism since Trump got into the race, and pointing people to the diagnostic inventory and test for narcissistic personality disorder. His disorder is so blatant. I’m happy to see an expert come to the same conclusion.
So many public people have commented on Trump’s extreme narcissism and the severe danger he’d pose if given any political power. Lipman lays out what I see as a compelling case against supporting Trump in anything. I wish more people were open to seeing him as he is.